Chaplain Scott S.
10/14/2018
It is unfortunate when you must guide a contractor and advise how a repair is to be completed. The same repairman returned to our home to attempt the two jobs originally paid for. This experience references a new kitchen sink and a new bathroom sink and two visits that did not see the jobs completed satisfactorily. The kitchen sink required new drainage piping that initially the repairman advised the cabinetry would have to be cut to access the full extent of the piping to complete the installation of the new sink. I advised the repairman how to avoid this damage to the cabinet that he advised he would not be responsible to repair. My suggestions were successful, and the repair job was competed to 95%. He failed to add the spray hose weight. He completed this repair to our satisfaction during his return visit. The bathroom sink has been attempted twice by the same repairman with a colleague on the second visit and is STILL not complete. The bathroom was renovated with a new countertop, faucet and vessel sink. Initially, the repairman was uncertain how to install the new faucet, claiming the shipping container did not contain the necessary parts for the new faucet. The additional parts to complete the installation were supplied as he was unaware how to finish the job. The vessel sink installation remains unsatisfactory and the same person will not be requested to our home again. The sink was not sealed to the countertop and spun freely loosening the drainage piping. The incomplete seal of the sink was addressed. Within minutes, I was retrieved to review their work. I was presented with a sloppy application of a silicone adhesive beneath the vessel sink to the new countertop. They were advised to redo the application and inquired if they removed the sink as required to apply the silicone properly. Upon a second review, there was a 4-inch bead of silicone extending from the sink bottom out onto the countertop, the back side was not sealed, and the right side of the translucent sink was sealed with a black substance. These two repairmen considered this job completed. No customer should have to advise any professional repairman how to do a job. No customer should have to call a reputable company to complete a job 3 times. No customer should have to pay any company for a return visit to complete a job that wasn't completed correctly the first time. I was advised that these repairman's supervisor was being called to inquire of our cost for the return visit. Fortunately, the supervisor was not as abrasive as his employees and did not charge for the second visit of which we would not have paid for. This job remains incomplete, there remains a sloppy silicone application beneath this sink. The sink will have to be removed from the new countertop, the silicone removed, and the sink resealed properly as it should have been done the first time. We will not recall David Gray to attempt to complete this job for the third time, nor will we be threatened to have to pay again for a job not done right originally. If it were not for the repeat back surgeries I have suffered, I would do the job myself. One last comment, there was a great reluctance to address this second call from the three times I attempted to call in the request and to the apprehension of the original repairman's attitude when he returned to our home. The only reason we believe this return visit was completed was because I addressed the original visit with an electrical supervisor (as a plumbing supervisor refused to return my call) and advised that numerous electrical jobs needed completed. Following an electrical job assessment, the plumbing work was rescheduled. Unfortunately for David Gray, due to the poor plumbing workmanship, the electrical work was not completed by David Gray electric. Fortunately for us, the electrical work was completed by another company for $400 less than David Gray's quote and additional electric work David Gray said they would not do was done with professionalism and the first time by American Electrical.