Rebecca D.
03/10/2019 12:00:00 SA
Let me start by saying I've never written a negative review about a business before, but I feel compelled to do so in this instance in order to warn others about this business's deceitful and unscrupulous practices. A few weeks ago, we had a blockage in our main house line and called Mr. Rooter to unblock it. The first visit went fine, and the blockage seemingly went away. Three weeks later, it was blocked up again. Fortunately, we were still under Mr. Rooter's warranty, and they snaked the drain again. But because Mr. Rooter's camera services are handled by different people than their snaking services, there was no way to know whether the problem was truly fixed at this time. The man who snaked the drain said that they could send someone with a camera the next day and that they would reach out to us about the specific time. Relying on this, I took the day off of work, but I still hadn't heard anything by mid-day. I finally decided to reach out myself, only to be told that the camera man could not come until the next day. I therefore took yet another day off of work, which was annoying, but it was nothing in comparison to what was to come.
The next morning, the camera man ran the camera through our main line. Even though the pipe had been snaked less than 48 hours earlier, the line was completely backed up with standing water. When the camera got to 40 ft out, the camera man said he thought he was at the street. Even though we hadn't been able to see what was causing the problem, he said it was clear that we would need to replace the entire line from the house to the street by digging up our yard, which would cost more than $6,000. He then proceeded to do a very hard sell, trying to get me to agree to them starting this work the next day. I told him we wanted to get quotes from other companies, but he continued to do the hard sell, saying that every other company would tell me the same thing and that the problem really needed to be fixed as quickly as possible. Thank goodness I held strong, and he left. The next day, I called several other plumbers who were all appalled at the idea that a company had recommended a complete pipe replacement when they had not even located the source of the problem. All of the other plumbers said they would need to redo the work that Mr. Rooter had done, i.e., snake the pipe again and run a camera again until they could figure out what was actually causing the problem. Even though this meant I would be paying another $600 for work that was already done, I decided this was better than simply agreeing to pay more than $6,000 when we didn't know what was causing the problem.
The other plumbing company sent a man out the very same day to redo Mr. Rooter's work. The other plumber started by running a camera in the line but at 40 ft, i.e., the same place where Mr. Rooter's camera man had said he thought he had reached the street, the other plumber hit a blockage. The other plumber then snaked the drain, made it out to 100 ft, and pulled back a huge ball of roots. With most of the blockages removed and the water gone, the other plumber put his camera back in the line and saw that there were more roots coming into the pipe at 56 ft, just before our house line tapped into the county sewer line, and almost certainly under the street as opposed to our yard.
To summarize, Mr. Rooter's camera man seems to have intentionally misled me into thinking he had investigated the entire pipe when in fact he had to have known that he was hitting a blockage and decided rather than trying to remove this blockage and trying to discover the source of the problem, he would try to convince me to pay for an extremely expensive project that WOULDN'T HAVE EVEN SOLVED THE PROBLEM.
To make matters worse, when I called Mr. Rooter to notify them of this dishonest behavior and ask for a refund, I was told that they didn't care if their camera man lied to me; because he didn't FORCE me to agree to the full pipe replacement, they didn't think they'd done anything wrong. That is an outrageous position for a company to take. I therefore strongly encourage everyone not to use this company.